Obtaining Shear-Wave Velocity Structure to 100 Meters Depth
From Microtremor Recordings on Seismic Refraction Equipment
John N. Louie
Seismological Laboratory
and Dept. of Geological Sciences
Mackay School of Mines, The University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557-0141
Phone: 775-784-4219 Email:
louie@seismo.unr.edu Web: www.seismo.unr.edu
- Acrobat PDF 4 copies of poster at
3x4 feet
or page size.
- Paper in press in BSSA.
(HTML)
Abstract:
Current techniques of estimating shallow shear velocities for
assessment of earthquake site response are too costly for use at most
construction sites. They require large sources to be effective in noisy
urban settings, or specialized independent recorders laid out in an
extensive array. I propose that microtremor noise recordings made on
200-m-long lines of seismic refraction equipment can estimate shear
velocity with 20% accuracy, often to 100 m depths. The combination of
commonly available equipment, simple recording with no source, a
wavefield transformation data processing technique, and an interactive
Rayleigh-wave dispersion modeling tool exploits the most effective
aspects of the microtremor, SASW, and MASW techniques. The
slowness-frequency wavefield transformation is particularly effective
in allowing accurate picking of Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity dispersion
curves despite the presence of waves propagating across the linear
array at high apparent velocities, higher-mode Rayleigh waves, body
waves, air waves, and incoherent noise. I illustrate application of
this technique at many urban and rural locations in Nevada, Southern
California, and New Zealand. With no source, densely urbanized locations
gave better results than quiet rural settings. Thirty-meter average
velocities estimated from P-wave hammer refraction agreed with
surface-wave results to better than 10%, under the assumption that
soils have Poisson's ratios of 0.25-0.30. This technique duplicated
microtremor array results above 3 Hz, but could not estimate velocities
deeper than 100 m. Surface-wave dispersion modeling cannot duplicate
the detail in the velocity profile yielded by a suspension logger, but
was able to match the average velocity of 10-20 m depth ranges and
suggest structure below the 100 m logged depth of a hole in Southern
California.