Meeting Minutes
Future Committee: Geologic Hazards
April 21, 2000
Present:
Jane Long, Dennis Bryan, Alan Rameli, Kyle House, John Bell, John Louie,
Scott Tyler, Craig DePaolo, John Anderson, Larry Johnson
Absent-- folks who might be interested: Jim Carr, Bob
Watters, Rich Schultz, Jim Taranik, Jim Brune, Jon Price, Rich
Schweickert, Bob Karlin, Steve Wesnouski, Geoff Blewitt
The meeting covered these topics: =20
- 1.
What are
we doing in Geologic Hazards?
2. &nb=
sp; What
do companies hiring GE=92s need w.r.t. geologic hazards?
3. &n=
bsp; What
are some of the =93holes=94 in our programs?
4. &n=
bsp; What
are some untapped synergies that are possible with existing
expertise?
(Scott and Jane spoke for Jim Carr, Dick French, Bobby Watters and Rich
Schultz to the best of their abilities!)
1. What are we doing now?
=B7 &=
nbsp; Jim
Carr: Flood frequency analyses, risk analysis, remote sensing,
and???
=B7  =
; Dick
French: Flood hazards on alluvial fans
=B7  =
; Bob
Watters: volcanic hazards, avalanches, slope stability and ???
=B7  =
; Rich
Schultz: Rock failure analysis and ???
=B7  =
; Alan
Rameli: Paleo seismology, geologic mapping of flood hazards
=B7  =
; Kyle
House: Geologic studies of floods in small washes to large
rivers
=B7  =
; John
Bell: Environmental geology mapping
=B7  =
; John
Louie: exploration geophysics applied to earthquake hazard
analysis, Seismo web page, a new inexpensive way to measure local S-wave
velocities needed for site engineering
=B7  =
; Scott
Tyler (and hydro program): Groundwater contamination, risk
assessment, groundwater withdrawal, mine dewatering, safe yield issues,
recharge estimates, flood analysis, nutrient flux into Lake Tahoe, waste
containment, heap leach and waste rock dump operations, stability of
covers, interest in swelling soils
=B7  =
; Craig
DePaolo: New ways to characterize seismic hazard, public
education. Craig notes that the strength of MSM is that the
geologists talk to the seismologists.
=B7  =
; John
Anderson: seismic network measuring ground motions, deployment of
digital measurements w/o state support, source physics, wave
propagations, basin response, small scale site response, prediction of
ground motion from an earthquake on a known fault, use of gps in hazard
identification, precarious rock studies to bound earthquake=20
hazards.
2. What do companies need?
- =B7
Denni=
s
Bryan: Nee people who recognize geologic hazards. They rely
on NBMG information and mapping for their business.
=B7 =
Larry
Johnson: Need broad skills, not specific, arcane training.
Both would like to hire BS degrees and train from there. Need for
professional degree programs.
This discussion was largely deferred due to the absence of all GE faculty
from the meeting.
3. Holes in our program:
- =B7
Subsi=
dence
since Don Helm left, this area of expertise is a major hole
=B7 =
Swelling
soils this is, from a total dollar amount involved, the largest
geologic hazard in the state and we have no one working on it
=B7  =
; Science
of risk analysismany of us work on this, but we have no risk
specialist
=B7  =
; In
NBMG: landslides, swelling soilsBobby Watters works on landslides,
but there is no one in the NBMG
4. Possible new synergies with existing resources:
- =B7
Use
fracture mechanics in analysis of earthquake mechanics: Rich
Schultz and Craig DePaolo might be interested to collaborate
=B7 =
Use
remote sensing to produce environmental geology maps in key areas
currently under rapid development but where there is little funding for
on-the-ground mapping: Jim Taranik and Jon Bell might be interested
to collaborate.
=B7  =
; Develop
a stronger explicit relationship with earthquake engineering side of
CE. Perhaps have a workshop with all folks doing earthquake work on
campus: John Anderson and Ian Buckle should discuss.
=B7  =
; Develop
a stronger explicit relationship with Gary Norris on expansive
soils. Who on our side?
=B7  =
; Develop
a series of short courses on geologic hazards say in the Reno
area. NBMG might collaborate with GSD/GE such that student FTE
might be generated and revenue could go to those that teach the
course. Larry and Dennis thought there would be very high demand
for such short courses. We might collaborate with CE on a short
course on earthquake hazards.
We plan to have another meeting to discuss the academic issues with the
GE faculty.